vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $127.6M, roughly 2.0× JBG SMITH Properties). JBG SMITH Properties runs the higher net margin — -18.1% vs -125.2%, a 107.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
JBGS vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $-23.0M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | -18.1% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
| Property rental | $105.9M | 83% |
| Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements | $17.2M | 13% |
| Other revenue | $4.5M | 4% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
