vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and Phreesia, Inc. (PHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $120.3M, roughly 1.1× Phreesia, Inc.). Phreesia, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -35.7%, a 39.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phreesia, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.7% vs -2.5%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
JBGS vs PHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $120.3M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $4.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | 129.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $120.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $654.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $106.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $320.3M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $423.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $106.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $90.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $320.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $298.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $282.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $423.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $408.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $400.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $15.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
