vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.4× JBG SMITH Properties). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -35.7%, a 42.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
JBGS vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
