vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $113.3M, roughly 1.1× SITIME Corp). SITIME Corp runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -35.7%, a 43.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.3% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
JBGS vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $113.3M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 56.4% |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | 1.6% |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | 66.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | 148.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $43.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $33.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $-28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 53.5% |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | -106.1% |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | -61.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | -86.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $-1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $-1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $692.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $696.2M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $878.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $942.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $25.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $35.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $-181.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
