vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $90.2M, roughly 1.4× TWIN DISC INC). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs -18.1%, a 42.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBG SMITH Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, TWIN DISC INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs -2.9%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.
JBGS vs TWIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $90.2M |
| Net Profit | $-23.0M | $22.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | -18.1% | 24.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.1% | 2334.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $1.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $127.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $96.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $81.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $89.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $84.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $919.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $7.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | -18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.54 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $44.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $184.5M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $384.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $164.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $149.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $157.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $154.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $363.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $355.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $332.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $307.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $323.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $312.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-70.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $11.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $906.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
| Property rental | $105.9M | 83% |
| Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements | $17.2M | 13% |
| Other revenue | $4.5M | 4% |
TWIN
Segment breakdown not available.