vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

JBG SMITH Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($127.6M vs $90.2M, roughly 1.4× TWIN DISC INC). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs -18.1%, a 42.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBG SMITH Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, TWIN DISC INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs -2.9%).

JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.

Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.

JBGS vs TWIN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
JBGS
JBGS
1.4× larger
JBGS
$127.6M
$90.2M
TWIN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
JBGS
JBGS
+5.4% gap
JBGS
5.7%
0.3%
TWIN
Higher net margin
TWIN
TWIN
42.9% more per $
TWIN
24.8%
-18.1%
JBGS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TWIN
TWIN
Annualised
TWIN
10.3%
-2.9%
JBGS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Revenue
$127.6M
$90.2M
Net Profit
$-23.0M
$22.4M
Gross Margin
24.8%
Operating Margin
2.3%
Net Margin
-18.1%
24.8%
Revenue YoY
5.7%
0.3%
Net Profit YoY
57.1%
2334.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.32
$1.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
$127.6M
Q4 25
$127.6M
$90.2M
Q3 25
$123.9M
$80.0M
Q2 25
$126.5M
$96.7M
Q1 25
$120.7M
$81.2M
Q4 24
$130.8M
$89.9M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$72.9M
Q2 24
$135.3M
$84.4M
Net Profit
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
$-23.0M
Q4 25
$-45.5M
$22.4M
Q3 25
$-28.6M
$-518.0K
Q2 25
$-19.2M
$1.4M
Q1 25
$-45.7M
$-1.5M
Q4 24
$-59.9M
$919.0K
Q3 24
$-27.0M
$-2.8M
Q2 24
$-24.4M
$7.4M
Gross Margin
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
24.8%
Q3 25
28.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
Q1 25
26.7%
Q4 24
24.1%
Q3 24
26.5%
Q2 24
29.7%
Operating Margin
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
-47.5%
2.3%
Q3 25
-27.5%
2.8%
Q2 25
-18.4%
5.5%
Q1 25
-44.7%
2.4%
Q4 24
-53.6%
3.1%
Q3 24
-22.4%
-0.2%
Q2 24
-24.3%
5.6%
Net Margin
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
-18.1%
Q4 25
-35.7%
24.8%
Q3 25
-23.1%
-0.6%
Q2 25
-15.2%
1.5%
Q1 25
-37.9%
-1.8%
Q4 24
-45.8%
1.0%
Q3 24
-19.8%
-3.8%
Q2 24
-18.0%
8.8%
EPS (diluted)
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
$-0.32
Q4 25
$-0.76
$1.55
Q3 25
$-0.48
$-0.04
Q2 25
$-0.29
$0.10
Q1 25
$-0.56
$-0.11
Q4 24
$-0.70
$0.07
Q3 24
$-0.32
$-0.20
Q2 24
$-0.27
$0.54

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$44.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$184.5M
Total Assets
$4.3B
$384.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$75.3M
Q3 25
$64.4M
Q2 25
$61.4M
Q1 25
$81.3M
Q4 24
$145.8M
Q3 24
$137.0M
Q2 24
$163.5M
Total Debt
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$44.5M
Q3 25
$43.7M
Q2 25
$31.4M
Q1 25
$40.8M
Q4 24
$24.9M
Q3 24
$29.8M
Q2 24
$25.8M
Stockholders' Equity
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.2B
$184.5M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$160.3M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$164.0M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$149.5M
Q4 24
$1.8B
$147.0M
Q3 24
$1.9B
$157.5M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$154.7M
Total Assets
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
$4.3B
Q4 25
$4.4B
$384.0M
Q3 25
$4.4B
$363.5M
Q2 25
$4.5B
$355.6M
Q1 25
$4.7B
$332.9M
Q4 24
$5.0B
$307.4M
Q3 24
$5.2B
$323.5M
Q2 24
$5.3B
$312.1M
Debt / Equity
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.24×
Q3 25
0.27×
Q2 25
0.19×
Q1 25
0.27×
Q4 24
0.17×
Q3 24
0.19×
Q2 24
0.17×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$4.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.20×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-70.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$73.3M
$4.6M
Q3 25
$8.9M
$-7.5M
Q2 25
$18.8M
$16.4M
Q1 25
$12.9M
$3.2M
Q4 24
$129.4M
$8.7M
Q3 24
$26.4M
$-4.3M
Q2 24
$23.8M
$11.4M
Free Cash Flow
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.2M
Q3 25
$-11.0M
Q2 25
$8.7M
Q1 25
$906.0K
Q4 24
$5.9M
Q3 24
$-6.7M
Q2 24
$10.3M
FCF Margin
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.4%
Q3 25
-13.7%
Q2 25
9.0%
Q1 25
1.1%
Q4 24
6.5%
Q3 24
-9.2%
Q2 24
12.2%
Capex Intensity
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.7%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
8.0%
Q1 25
2.8%
Q4 24
3.1%
Q3 24
3.2%
Q2 24
1.3%
Cash Conversion
JBGS
JBGS
TWIN
TWIN
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
Q2 25
11.55×
Q1 25
Q4 24
9.42×
Q3 24
Q2 24
1.54×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

JBGS
JBGS

Property rental$105.9M83%
Third-party real estate services, including reimbursements$17.2M13%
Other revenue$4.5M4%

TWIN
TWIN

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons