vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBT Marel Corp (JBTM) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBT Marel Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $625.1M, roughly 1.6× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 5.3%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 15.7%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $83.5M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 4.6%).
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
JBTM vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 115.6% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 858.6% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.04 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.8M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $854.1M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.6M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $453.8M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.3M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.3M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-173.0M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.9M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.8% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.04 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.26 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.35 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.95 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.71 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.9M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.9M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $648.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $647.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.43× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $117.4M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.5M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.21× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.1M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $117.4M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.7M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.2M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.7M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.9M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.4M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.7M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.7M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-100.0K | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.0% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.21× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.06× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
