vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBT Marel Corp (JBTM) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JBT Marel Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.1× ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 5.3%, a 24.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs 8.7%). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $83.5M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs 9.6%).
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
JBTM vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 115.6% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 858.6% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.04 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $934.8M | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $854.1M | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $467.6M | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $453.8M | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.3M | $777.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $392.3M | $742.0M |
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-173.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.9M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | $201.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.5% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.04 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.26 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.35 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.21 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.95 | $1.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.71 | $0.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $167.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5B | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.33× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $648.3M | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.7M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $647.0M | $544.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $87.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $87.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.33× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.34× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.41× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.43× | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $117.4M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.5M | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.21× | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.1M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $117.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.7M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.2M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.9M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $251.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.4M | $261.0M |
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.7M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.0M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.1M | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-100.0K | $231.0M |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.0% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.21× | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.06× | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.