vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL) and TDH Holdings, Inc. (PETZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JONES LANG LASALLE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $103.4K, roughly 73578.0× TDH Holdings, Inc.). TDH Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1169.3% vs 5.3%, a 1164.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
TDH Holdings, Inc. is a pet product enterprise that develops, manufactures and distributes a comprehensive portfolio of pet food, nutritional treats, and daily pet supplies for dogs and cats. Its primary market is mainland China, catering to both online e-commerce and offline physical retail customer segments.
JLL vs PETZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $103.4K |
| Net Profit | $401.8M | $1.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | -1047.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 1169.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 66.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $8.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $103.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $401.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -1047.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1169.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.61 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.98 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.75 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.37 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $599.1M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.5B | $27.4M |
| Total Assets | $17.8B | $33.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $599.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $401.4M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $424.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $396.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.0B | $-2.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.52× | -1.78× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-767.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $927.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-677.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.01× | -1.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JLL
| Workplace Management | $3.8B | 50% |
| Project Management | $1.1B | 15% |
| Leasing Advisory | $1.0B | 13% |
| Leasing | $964.9M | 13% |
| Property Management | $480.2M | 6% |
| Portfolio Services And Other | $152.1M | 2% |
| Advisory Fees | $98.1M | 1% |
| Loan Servicing | $42.2M | 1% |
| Transaction Fees Other | $16.4M | 0% |
PETZ
Segment breakdown not available.
