vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (JMSB) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.8M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.3× Laird Superfood, Inc.). John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.3% vs -13.2%, a 49.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 15.3%).
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company that operates through its wholly owned subsidiary John Marshall Bank. It provides a full suite of commercial and consumer banking products including deposit accounts, commercial loans, residential mortgages, and personal financial services, primarily serving retail customers and small-to-mid-sized businesses across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
JMSB vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.8M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.1M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 36.3% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-239.1K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | -3.4% |
| Q1 26 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.2% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.9% | -2.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $150.2M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $268.1M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $150.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.6M | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $265.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.7M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.1M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $12.6M |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $18.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $642.7K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 134.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JMSB
| Net Interest Income | $16.5M | 98% |
| Noninterest Income | $284.0K | 2% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
