vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (JMSB) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($16.8M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.1× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.3% vs -2.0%, a 38.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 15.3%).
John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company that operates through its wholly owned subsidiary John Marshall Bank. It provides a full suite of commercial and consumer banking products including deposit accounts, commercial loans, residential mortgages, and personal financial services, primarily serving retail customers and small-to-mid-sized businesses across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic region.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
JMSB vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.8M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $6.1M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 36.3% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | $6.1M | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.4% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.5% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.7% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | 36.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.1% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.9% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.36 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.34 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.30 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $150.2M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $268.1M | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $150.2M | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.0M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.6M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.2M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.6M | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $268.1M | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $265.6M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.7M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.7M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.6M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.1M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $64.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.0M | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 134.7% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 116.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.1% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.82× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.61× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JMSB
| Net Interest Income | $16.5M | 98% |
| Noninterest Income | $284.0K | 2% |
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
