vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JOINT Corp (JYNT) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JOINT Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.2M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.1× Venus Concept Inc.). JOINT Corp runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -163.8%, a 170.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JOINT Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs -8.2%). JOINT Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($334.7K vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Venus Concept Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-12.8% CAGR vs -28.6%).
The Joint Corp is a leading operator and franchisor of chiropractic care clinics primarily serving the U.S. market. It offers accessible, affordable routine chiropractic services, membership-based care plans, and caters to consumers seeking non-invasive musculoskeletal pain management and wellness support.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
JYNT vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.2M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $991.1K | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5510.5% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $991.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $855.0K | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.4K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $967.8K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.2M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $947.0K | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.1% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.1% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 77.3% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.4% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.7% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.7% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 90.9% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.6% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.2% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.9% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.5% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.9% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.21 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.6M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.1M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $61.0M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.7M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.7M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $61.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.4M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.2M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.2M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.7M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.8M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $334.7K | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.2% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.86× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.9M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.6K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-973.5K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $334.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.6K | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.8% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.9% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 532.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.97× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JYNT
| Transferred At Point In Time | $12.8M | 84% |
| Transferred Over Time | $2.4M | 16% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
