vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (KFFB) and Scilex Holding Co (SCLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Scilex Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.7× Kentucky First Federal Bancorp). Kentucky First Federal Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs -961.9%, a 972.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kentucky First Federal Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.3% vs -67.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Kentucky First Federal Bancorp's revenue compounded faster (24.0% CAGR vs -33.6%).
Kentucky First Federal Bancorp is a U.S. regional bank holding company based in Kentucky. It offers retail and commercial banking services including deposits, mortgage loans, consumer lending and small business financing, serving local individual customers and small-to-medium enterprises across its Kentucky operating regions.
Scilex Holding Co is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing innovative non-opioid pain management therapies for acute and chronic pain segments. It primarily serves the US market, offering prescription and over-the-counter pain relief solutions for patients and healthcare providers.
KFFB vs SCLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8M | $4.8M |
| Net Profit | $304.0K | $-46.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | -2317.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | -961.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.3% | -67.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2238.5% | -613.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $-4.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $304.0K | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.0K | $-257.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.0K | $-44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0K | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0K | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.0K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-107.0K | $-24.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 66.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | -2317.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | -1766.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -207.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | -557.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | -190.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.0% | -138.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -58.7% | -95.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.9% | -179.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -961.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.9% | -2441.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -445.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | -521.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | -43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.7% | -30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | -229.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.8% | -224.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $-4.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-22.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-7.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-2.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $8.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-7.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-8.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.7M | $5.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $49.1M | $-207.8M |
| Total Assets | $375.3M | $365.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $878.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $77.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.4M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $-207.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.8M | $-176.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $-249.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.2M | $-211.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.1M | $-192.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.2M | $-211.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.0M | $-214.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.0M | $-189.8M |
| Q4 25 | $375.3M | $365.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $366.5M | $275.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.2M | $83.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.7M | $79.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.2M | $93.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.6M | $100.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $375.0M | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $369.1M | $91.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-303.0K | $-17.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-367.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -12.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.00× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-377.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-303.0K | $-17.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $450.0K | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-86.0K | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-155.0K | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-176.0K | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-367.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-235.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-220.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-191.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.49× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
