vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kestrel Group Ltd (KG) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $17.4M, roughly 1.5× Kestrel Group Ltd). Kestrel Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — -29.0% vs -72.1%, a 43.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Kestrel is an American bicycle brand which specialized in high-end bikes for triathlons and road racing.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
KG vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.4M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.1M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -23.3% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | -29.0% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.65 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.9M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.3% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.0% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1258.8% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.05 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.9M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $143.8M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $173.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.8M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.1M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $467.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.7M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.7M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KG
Segment breakdown not available.
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
