vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Magnera Corp (MAGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Magnera Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($792.0M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.5× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -4.3%, a 32.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magnera Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Magnera Corp's revenue compounded faster (54.9% CAGR vs 3.8%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
KIM vs MAGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $542.5M | $792.0M |
| Net Profit | $151.2M | $-34.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.4% | 1.8% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | -4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 43.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.95 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | $792.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | $839.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | $824.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $702.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $332.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $556.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $503.8M | $558.0M |
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | $-41.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.0M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.9% | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.2% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.69 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.6M | $264.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.7B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $19.7B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | 1.86× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | $264.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | $276.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | $282.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $215.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $230.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.4M | $30.2M |
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $877.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $884.7M |
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.5B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4M | $2.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | $65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $176.1M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 2.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
MAGN
| Other | $451.0M | 57% |
| United States And Canada | $341.0M | 43% |
