vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (SBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($943.2M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 4.8%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 1.9%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. is an American international specialty retailer and distributor of professional beauty supplies with revenues of more than $3.9 billion annually.

KIM vs SBH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SBH
SBH
1.7× larger
SBH
$943.2M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+2.7% gap
KIM
3.2%
0.6%
SBH
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
23.0% more per $
KIM
27.9%
4.8%
SBH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
1.9%
SBH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Revenue
$542.5M
$943.2M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$45.6M
Gross Margin
51.2%
Operating Margin
36.4%
8.1%
Net Margin
27.9%
4.8%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
0.6%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
-25.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.45

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$542.5M
$943.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$947.1M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$933.3M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$883.1M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$937.9M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$935.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$942.3M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$908.4M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$151.2M
$45.6M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$49.9M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$45.7M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$39.2M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$61.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$37.7M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$29.2M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
51.2%
Q3 25
52.2%
Q2 25
51.5%
Q1 25
52.0%
Q4 24
50.8%
Q3 24
51.2%
Q2 24
51.0%
Q1 24
51.0%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
36.4%
8.1%
Q3 25
34.9%
8.4%
Q2 25
39.2%
8.4%
Q1 25
33.6%
7.9%
Q4 24
31.7%
10.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
8.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
7.6%
Q1 24
25.9%
6.6%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
27.9%
4.8%
Q3 25
25.7%
5.3%
Q2 25
31.0%
4.9%
Q1 25
24.8%
4.4%
Q4 24
31.6%
6.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
5.1%
Q2 24
23.9%
4.0%
Q1 24
-2.2%
3.2%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$0.45
Q3 25
$0.49
Q2 25
$0.44
Q1 25
$0.38
Q4 24
$0.58
Q3 24
$0.45
Q2 24
$0.36
Q1 24
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$157.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$842.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$823.6M
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
1.02×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$211.6M
$157.2M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$149.2M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$112.8M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$92.2M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$105.5M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$108.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$97.4M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$97.2M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$7.7B
$842.5M
Q3 25
$862.0M
Q2 25
$882.4M
Q1 25
$902.8M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$938.1M
Q3 24
$978.3M
Q2 24
$978.9M
Q1 24
$978.4M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$10.4B
$823.6M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$794.2M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$762.9M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$699.8M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$656.5M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$628.5M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$577.7M
Q1 24
$10.6B
$550.9M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.8B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
0.74×
1.02×
Q3 25
1.09×
Q2 25
1.16×
Q1 25
1.29×
Q4 24
0.75×
1.43×
Q3 24
1.56×
Q2 24
1.69×
Q1 24
1.78×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$93.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$57.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
6.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
3.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
2.05×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$216.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$258.4M
$93.2M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$120.9M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$69.4M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$51.1M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$33.5M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$110.7M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$47.9M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$36.9M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
$57.5M
Q3 25
$78.0M
Q2 25
$49.1M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$32.2M
Q4 24
$13.4M
Q3 24
$73.3M
Q2 24
$28.7M
Q1 24
$22.8M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
6.1%
Q3 25
8.2%
Q2 25
5.3%
Q1 25
38.3%
3.6%
Q4 24
1.4%
Q3 24
7.8%
Q2 24
3.1%
Q1 24
2.5%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
0.0%
3.8%
Q3 25
0.0%
4.5%
Q2 25
0.0%
2.2%
Q1 25
3.4%
2.1%
Q4 24
2.1%
Q3 24
4.0%
Q2 24
2.0%
Q1 24
1.6%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
SBH
SBH
Q4 25
1.71×
2.05×
Q3 25
2.41×
2.42×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.52×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.30×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.55×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.30×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.27×
Q1 24
1.26×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

SBH
SBH

Sally Beauty Supply$531.6M56%
Beauty Systems Group$411.6M44%

Related Comparisons