vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Simply Good Foods Co (SMPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $340.2M, roughly 1.6× Simply Good Foods Co). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 7.4%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs 3.0%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Whole Foods Market, Inc. is an American multinational supermarket chain headquartered in Austin, Texas, owned wholly by Amazon, and which generally sells whole food products free from hydrogenated fats and artificial colors, flavors, and preservatives. A USDA Certified Organic grocer in the United States, the chain is popularly known for its organic selections.

KIM vs SMPL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.6× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$340.2M
SMPL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+3.6% gap
KIM
3.2%
-0.3%
SMPL
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
20.4% more per $
KIM
27.9%
7.4%
SMPL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
3.0%
SMPL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Revenue
$542.5M
$340.2M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$25.3M
Gross Margin
32.3%
Operating Margin
36.4%
11.0%
Net Margin
27.9%
7.4%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
-0.3%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
-33.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$542.5M
$340.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$381.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$341.3M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$375.7M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$334.8M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$312.2M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$151.2M
$25.3M
Q3 25
$137.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$41.1M
Q1 25
$132.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$38.1M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$29.3M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$41.3M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$33.1M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
32.3%
Q3 25
Q2 25
36.4%
Q1 25
Q4 24
38.2%
Q3 24
38.8%
Q2 24
39.9%
Q1 24
37.4%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
36.4%
11.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
15.6%
Q1 25
33.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
16.0%
Q3 24
33.7%
12.7%
Q2 24
32.1%
17.6%
Q1 24
25.9%
15.4%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
27.9%
7.4%
Q3 25
25.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
10.8%
Q1 25
24.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
11.2%
Q3 24
26.8%
7.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
12.3%
Q1 24
-2.2%
10.6%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$0.26
Q3 25
Q2 25
$0.40
Q1 25
Q4 24
$0.38
Q3 24
$0.29
Q2 24
$0.41
Q1 24
$0.33

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$194.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.7B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$211.6M
$194.1M
Q3 25
$159.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$98.0M
Q1 25
$131.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$121.8M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$132.5M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$208.7M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$135.9M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
$397.5M
Q2 24
$237.7M
Q1 24
$237.7M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$10.5B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.8B
Q1 25
$10.6B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$10.6B
$1.6B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$19.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.4B
Q1 25
$19.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.2B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$2.1B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
0.23×
Q2 24
0.14×
Q1 24
0.14×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$50.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$48.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
0.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
1.98×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$223.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$258.4M
$50.1M
Q3 25
$332.4M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$101.1M
Q1 25
$223.8M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$32.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$48.9M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$72.8M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$46.5M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
$48.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$98.9M
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
$31.7M
Q3 24
$45.0M
Q2 24
$72.0M
Q1 24
$46.1M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
14.1%
Q3 25
Q2 25
25.9%
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
9.3%
Q3 24
12.0%
Q2 24
21.5%
Q1 24
14.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
0.0%
0.6%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.6%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
0.1%
Q3 24
1.0%
Q2 24
0.2%
Q1 24
0.1%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
SMPL
SMPL
Q4 25
1.71×
1.98×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
2.46×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.84×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.67×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.76×
Q1 24
1.40×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

SMPL
SMPL

Quest$211.4M62%
Atkins Domain$79.7M23%
OWYN$28.1M8%
Other$20.9M6%

Related Comparisons