vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC (TCBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $324.0M, roughly 1.7× TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 22.8%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Texas Capital Bank is a bank headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The bank has branches located in every major city in Texas. Its parent bank holding company is Texas Capital Bancshares. It also operates an online-only banking division, Bask Bank.

KIM vs TCBI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.7× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$324.0M
TCBI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TCBI
TCBI
+11.5% gap
TCBI
15.5%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
7.0% more per $
KIM
29.8%
22.8%
TCBI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TCBI
TCBI
Annualised
TCBI
10.2%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Revenue
$558.0M
$324.0M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$73.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
22.8%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
15.5%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
56.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$1.56

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
$558.0M
$324.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$327.5M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$340.4M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$307.5M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$280.5M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$229.6M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$125.3M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$267.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
$166.3M
$73.8M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$100.7M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$105.2M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$77.3M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$47.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$71.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-61.3M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$41.7M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
40.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
40.5%
Q2 25
39.2%
33.2%
Q1 25
33.6%
21.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
40.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
-63.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
21.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
29.8%
22.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
30.7%
Q3 25
25.7%
30.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
25.2%
Q1 25
24.8%
16.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
30.9%
Q3 24
26.8%
-48.9%
Q2 24
23.9%
15.6%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
$0.46
$1.56
Q4 25
$2.11
Q3 25
$2.18
Q2 25
$1.58
Q1 25
$0.92
Q4 24
$1.43
Q3 24
$-1.41
Q2 24
$0.80

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
$878.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$3.6B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$33.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
$878.3M
Q4 25
$7.7B
$620.6M
Q3 25
$620.4M
Q2 25
$620.3M
Q1 25
$660.5M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$660.3M
Q3 24
$660.2M
Q2 24
$660.0M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
$10.4B
$3.6B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$3.6B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$3.6B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$3.5B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$3.4B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$3.4B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$3.4B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$3.2B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
$19.6B
$33.5B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$31.5B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$32.5B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$31.9B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$31.4B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$30.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$31.6B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$29.9B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
TCBI
TCBI
Q1 26
0.24×
Q4 25
0.74×
0.17×
Q3 25
0.17×
Q2 25
0.18×
Q1 25
0.19×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.20×
Q3 24
0.20×
Q2 24
0.21×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

TCBI
TCBI

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons