vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $341.0M, roughly 1.6× Utz Brands, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 0.7%, a 29.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Utz Brands, Inc., more commonly known as Utz, is an American snack food company based in Hanover, Pennsylvania. The company produces a variety of potato chips, pretzels, and other snacks, with most products sold under their family of brands. Utz is also a snack supplier to warehouse clubs and merchandisers.
KIM vs UTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $341.0M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $2.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 108.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | $356.2M |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | $19.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $56.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $768.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $696.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $66.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $768.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $780.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $797.6M |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | $696.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $685.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | $686.0M |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $54.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | $52.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | $8.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 23.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
UTZ
Segment breakdown not available.