vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.4M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.4× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.2% vs -19.9%, a 46.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs -20.7%). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($73.1M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
KINS vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.4M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $14.8M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 32.7% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 26.2% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.0% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 171.4% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.7M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.5M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.8M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 32.7% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $122.7M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.7M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.2M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.7M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.6M | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.4M | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.4M | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.9M | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.0M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $319.8M | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.3M | $426.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.9M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $73.1M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 129.5% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $124.0M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $73.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 129.5% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 132.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KINS
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
