vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $56.4M, roughly 1.7× KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.). On growth, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
KINS vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.4M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $14.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 32.7% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 26.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 34.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 171.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.5M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.8M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 32.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $122.7M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $122.7M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.2M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.7M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $319.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.3M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.9M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $73.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 129.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $124.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $73.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 129.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 132.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KINS
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
