vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Information Services Group Inc. (III) and KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Information Services Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.2M vs $56.4M, roughly 1.1× KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.2% vs 4.3%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs 5.9%). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($73.1M vs $4.3M). Over the past eight quarters, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs -2.4%).
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...
III vs KINS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.2M | $56.4M |
| Net Profit | $2.6M | $14.8M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 32.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 26.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 34.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.1% | 171.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $1.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.2M | $56.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.6M | $50.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.3M | $35.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 32.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.7% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $94.7M | $122.7M |
| Total Assets | $211.0M | $453.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $94.7M | $122.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.7M | $107.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.1M | $94.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.3M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.6M | $59.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.5M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $35.7M |
| Q4 25 | $211.0M | $453.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.3M | $428.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.7M | $393.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.4M | $385.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $374.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.3M | $319.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $234.2M | $318.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.1M | $75.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $4.3M | $73.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 129.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.94× | 5.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.0M | $124.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $75.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $978.0K | $17.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $73.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $55.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 129.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 132.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 51.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.94× | 5.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.62× | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.46× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.15× | 10.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.66× | 3.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.