vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS) and IMPINJ INC (PI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMPINJ INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.3M vs $56.4M, roughly 1.3× KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.2% vs 11.2%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs -0.0%). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($73.1M vs $2.2M). Over the past eight quarters, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs -14.9%).
Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...
Impinj, Inc. is an American manufacturer of radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices and software. The company was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The company was started based on the research done at the California Institute of Technology by Carver Mead and Chris Diorio. Impinj currently produces EPC Class 1, Gen 2 passive UHF RFID chips, RFID readers, RFID reader chips, and RFID antennas, and software applications for encoding chips, and gathering business ...
KINS vs PI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.4M | $74.3M |
| Net Profit | $14.8M | $8.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 32.7% | 30.5% |
| Net Margin | 26.2% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.0% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 171.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.7M | $96.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $74.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.5M | $102.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $221.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.7% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $131.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | $241.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $122.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $502.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $190.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $193.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $147.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $220.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | $280.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $280.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | $283.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $122.7M | $209.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | $187.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.2M | $160.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $136.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $117.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $502.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | $545.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.6M | $516.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.4M | $508.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.4M | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.9M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.0M | $476.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $319.8M | $446.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $73.1M | $2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 129.5% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $124.0M | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $44.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 129.5% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | -17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 132.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 43.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.12× | 45.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 4.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
