vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (KINS) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.4M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.1× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 26.2% vs -106.3%, a 132.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, KINGSTONE COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.6% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Kingstone Companies, Inc., headquartered in Kingston, New York, provides property and casualty insurance products through its subsidiary, Kingstone Insurance Company. It places contracts with the third-party licensed premium finance company through its subsidiary Payments, Inc., a NYS licensed Insurance Premium Finance Company. Kingstone Insurance Company was ranked #1 of the 81 insurers rated by the Professional Insurance Agents Association in its 2010 Company Performance Survey. The company...
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
KINS vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.4M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $14.8M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 32.7% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | 26.2% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.0% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 171.4% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.8M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.5M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.8M | $50.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 32.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $122.7M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $122.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.7M | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.2M | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.7M | $484.6M |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $319.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.3M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.9M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $73.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 129.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $124.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.9M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | $73.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 129.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 132.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.60× | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.65× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.27× | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
