vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC) and SFL Corp Ltd. (SFL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SFL Corp Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($353.7M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.8× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 1.1%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -27.0%).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
SFL Corp Ltd is a global maritime transportation and vessel owning enterprise with a diversified fleet including container ships, oil tankers, dry bulk carriers and offshore support vessels. It serves international logistics, energy and bulk commodity sectors, offering long-term and spot charter services to clients across major global trade routes.
KLIC vs SFL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.6M | $353.7M |
| Net Profit | $16.8M | $4.0M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 22.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | -27.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.4% | -93.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $199.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $353.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $484.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $414.5M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $364.7M |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $60.7M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $98.3M |
| Q1 26 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 38.3% |
| Q1 26 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 27.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $0.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.1M | $150.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $825.0M | $960.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $3.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $481.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $150.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $134.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $188.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $825.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $960.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.08× | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 2.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.9M | $118.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-11.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.53× | 29.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $182.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $112.1M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $188.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.82× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 1.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
SFL
Segment breakdown not available.
