vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of KEMPER Corp (KMPR) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KEMPER Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $625.1M, roughly 1.8× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -0.7%, a 14.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -4.7%). KEMPER Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($166.2M vs $140.3M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -0.5%).

Kemper Corporation is an American insurance provider with corporate headquarters located in Chicago, Illinois. With nearly $13 billion in assets, the Kemper family of companies provides insurance to individuals, families, and businesses.

AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...

KMPR vs WTS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KMPR
KMPR
1.8× larger
KMPR
$1.1B
$625.1M
WTS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WTS
WTS
+20.3% gap
WTS
15.7%
-4.7%
KMPR
Higher net margin
WTS
WTS
14.1% more per $
WTS
13.4%
-0.7%
KMPR
More free cash flow
KMPR
KMPR
$25.9M more FCF
KMPR
$166.2M
$140.3M
WTS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WTS
WTS
Annualised
WTS
4.6%
-0.5%
KMPR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Revenue
$1.1B
$625.1M
Net Profit
$-8.0M
$83.7M
Gross Margin
49.5%
Operating Margin
18.2%
Net Margin
-0.7%
13.4%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
15.7%
Net Profit YoY
-108.2%
24.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.03
$2.50

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$1.1B
$625.1M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$611.7M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$643.7M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$558.0M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$540.4M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$543.6M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$597.3M
Q1 24
$1.1B
$570.9M
Net Profit
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$-8.0M
$83.7M
Q3 25
$-21.0M
$82.2M
Q2 25
$72.6M
$100.9M
Q1 25
$99.7M
$74.0M
Q4 24
$97.4M
$67.5M
Q3 24
$73.7M
$69.1M
Q2 24
$75.4M
$82.0M
Q1 24
$71.3M
$72.6M
Gross Margin
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
49.5%
Q3 25
48.8%
Q2 25
50.6%
Q1 25
48.8%
Q4 24
46.7%
Q3 24
47.3%
Q2 24
47.7%
Q1 24
46.9%
Operating Margin
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
18.2%
Q3 25
18.2%
Q2 25
21.0%
Q1 25
15.7%
Q4 24
16.5%
Q3 24
11.2%
17.1%
Q2 24
10.1%
18.7%
Q1 24
7.6%
16.9%
Net Margin
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
-0.7%
13.4%
Q3 25
-1.7%
13.4%
Q2 25
5.9%
15.7%
Q1 25
8.4%
13.3%
Q4 24
8.2%
12.5%
Q3 24
6.3%
12.7%
Q2 24
6.7%
13.7%
Q1 24
6.2%
12.7%
EPS (diluted)
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$-0.03
$2.50
Q3 25
$-0.34
$2.45
Q2 25
$1.12
$3.01
Q1 25
$1.54
$2.21
Q4 24
$1.51
$2.02
Q3 24
$1.14
$2.06
Q2 24
$1.16
$2.44
Q1 24
$1.10
$2.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$405.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$943.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
$2.0B
Total Assets
$12.5B
$2.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$405.5M
Q3 25
$371.2M
$457.7M
Q2 25
$407.6M
$369.3M
Q1 25
$545.3M
$336.8M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$386.9M
Q3 24
$696.9M
$303.9M
Q2 24
$539.1M
$279.4M
Q1 24
$520.7M
$237.1M
Total Debt
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$943.5M
Q3 25
$943.1M
Q2 25
$942.6M
Q1 25
$942.1M
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.4B
Stockholders' Equity
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$2.7B
$2.0B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$370.0M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$366.0M
$1.8B
Q4 24
$2.8B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$2.8B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$358.0M
$1.6B
Q1 24
$2.6B
$1.6B
Total Assets
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$12.5B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$12.4B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$12.6B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$12.5B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$12.6B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$12.6B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$12.6B
$2.4B
Q1 24
$12.6B
$2.3B
Debt / Equity
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
0.35×
Q3 25
0.35×
Q2 25
2.55×
Q1 25
2.57×
Q4 24
0.50×
Q3 24
0.50×
Q2 24
3.88×
Q1 24
0.54×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$175.0M
$154.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$166.2M
$140.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.7%
22.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
2.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.85×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$553.9M
$356.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$175.0M
$154.7M
Q3 25
$139.9M
$122.4M
Q2 25
$89.6M
$69.7M
Q1 25
$180.0M
$55.2M
Q4 24
$175.1M
$139.5M
Q3 24
$141.9M
$90.7M
Q2 24
$22.9M
$85.3M
Q1 24
$43.0M
$45.6M
Free Cash Flow
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
$166.2M
$140.3M
Q3 25
$133.4M
$110.9M
Q2 25
$82.0M
$59.5M
Q1 25
$172.3M
$45.6M
Q4 24
$165.4M
$127.5M
Q3 24
$131.4M
$84.3M
Q2 24
$5.2M
$78.5M
Q1 24
$27.7M
$35.5M
FCF Margin
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
14.7%
22.4%
Q3 25
10.8%
18.1%
Q2 25
6.7%
9.2%
Q1 25
14.4%
8.2%
Q4 24
13.9%
23.6%
Q3 24
11.1%
15.5%
Q2 24
0.5%
13.1%
Q1 24
2.4%
6.2%
Capex Intensity
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
0.8%
2.3%
Q3 25
0.5%
1.9%
Q2 25
0.6%
1.6%
Q1 25
0.6%
1.7%
Q4 24
0.8%
2.2%
Q3 24
0.9%
1.2%
Q2 24
1.6%
1.1%
Q1 24
1.3%
1.8%
Cash Conversion
KMPR
KMPR
WTS
WTS
Q4 25
1.85×
Q3 25
1.49×
Q2 25
1.23×
0.69×
Q1 25
1.81×
0.75×
Q4 24
1.80×
2.07×
Q3 24
1.93×
1.31×
Q2 24
0.30×
1.04×
Q1 24
0.60×
0.63×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KMPR
KMPR

Specialty Property Casualty Insurance Segment$995.1M88%
Life Insurance Segment1$140.7M12%

WTS
WTS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons