vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KOSS CORP (KOSS) and MIND CTI LTD (MNDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MIND CTI LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9M vs $2.9M, roughly 1.7× KOSS CORP). MIND CTI LTD runs the higher net margin — 19.4% vs -19.8%, a 39.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. MIND CTI LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.0M vs $-1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, KOSS CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -45.1%).
Koss Corporation is a company in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US that manufactures headphones. The company created the first high-fidelity stereo headphones in 1958.
MIND CTI Ltd. is a global provider of billing and customer care solutions and messaging services for voice, data, video and content services. Headquartered in Yokneam, Israel; the company also has offices in the United States of America, Iaşi in Romania and in Germany.
KOSS vs MNDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9M | $4.9M |
| Net Profit | $-565.4K | $950.0K |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | -35.5% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | -19.8% | 19.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -700.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-565.4K | $950.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.7K | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-232.7K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-316.7K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.1K | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-419.5K | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-110.4K | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-313.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.0% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.1% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.5M | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $30.3M | $23.0M |
| Total Assets | $36.8M | $30.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.6M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.8M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.1M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.4M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.1M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.2M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-760.8K | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.1M | $4.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -37.5% | 81.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.9% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-546.7K | $14.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-760.8K | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $762.6K | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-534.9K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.4K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-252.0K | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.6K | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-174.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $328.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $761.5K | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-541.8K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-314.3K | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-155.6K | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-174.8K | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | -37.5% | 81.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.8% | 78.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.13× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.68× | 3.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
