vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.1M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.1× KILROY REALTY CORP). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs 6.3%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Grand Canyon Education, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $122.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE) is an American for-profit corporation that provides services to universities, specializing in program development, online education, and operational support. Formerly affiliated with Grand Canyon University (GCU), a Christian university in Arizona, GCE became a separate publicly traded company in 2008.
KRC vs LOPE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $308.1M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $86.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 35.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $3.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $261.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $247.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $289.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $292.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | $274.7M |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $41.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $81.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $68.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $3.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $2.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $2.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $1.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $2.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $746.9M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $992.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $97.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $192.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $144.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $324.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $241.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | $196.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $746.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $758.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $778.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $780.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $783.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $764.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $759.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $759.4M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $992.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $992.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $992.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $130.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $122.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 39.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $238.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $130.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $-48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $67.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $135.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | $85.0M |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $122.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $-58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $126.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $-39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | -22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | -2.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | 2.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | 0.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | -0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.