vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.0× KILROY REALTY CORP). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 6.3%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KILROY REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.0% vs -29.1%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $-57.2M).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
KRC vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $278.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $151.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
