vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and MSA Safety Inc (MSA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MSA Safety Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($510.9M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.9× KILROY REALTY CORP). MSA Safety Inc runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 6.3%, a 10.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MSA Safety Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $106.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MSA Safety Inc's revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs -1.2%).

Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.

Mine Safety Appliances, or MSA Safety Incorporated, is an American manufacturer and supplier of safety equipment designed for use in a variety of hazardous conditions in industries such as construction, the military, fire service, and chemical, oil, and gas production. MSA is based in the Pittsburgh suburb of Cranberry.

KRC vs MSA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MSA
MSA
1.9× larger
MSA
$510.9M
$272.2M
KRC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MSA
MSA
+7.2% gap
MSA
2.2%
-5.0%
KRC
Higher net margin
MSA
MSA
10.7% more per $
MSA
17.0%
6.3%
KRC
More free cash flow
KRC
KRC
$344.3M more FCF
KRC
$450.3M
$106.0M
MSA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MSA
MSA
Annualised
MSA
11.2%
-1.2%
KRC

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Revenue
$272.2M
$510.9M
Net Profit
$17.1M
$86.9M
Gross Margin
46.9%
Operating Margin
22.3%
Net Margin
6.3%
17.0%
Revenue YoY
-5.0%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
-73.7%
-1.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$2.22

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$272.2M
$510.9M
Q3 25
$279.7M
$468.4M
Q2 25
$289.9M
$474.1M
Q1 25
$270.8M
$421.3M
Q4 24
$286.4M
$499.7M
Q3 24
$289.9M
$432.7M
Q2 24
$280.7M
$462.5M
Q1 24
$278.6M
$413.3M
Net Profit
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$17.1M
$86.9M
Q3 25
$162.3M
$69.6M
Q2 25
$79.6M
$62.8M
Q1 25
$43.7M
$59.6M
Q4 24
$65.0M
$87.9M
Q3 24
$57.7M
$66.6M
Q2 24
$54.5M
$72.2M
Q1 24
$55.7M
$58.1M
Gross Margin
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
46.9%
Q3 25
46.5%
Q2 25
46.6%
Q1 25
45.9%
Q4 24
46.9%
Q3 24
47.9%
Q2 24
48.2%
Q1 24
47.3%
Operating Margin
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
22.3%
Q3 25
20.1%
Q2 25
18.1%
Q1 25
18.5%
Q4 24
23.5%
Q3 24
21.1%
Q2 24
21.6%
Q1 24
19.4%
Net Margin
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
6.3%
17.0%
Q3 25
58.0%
14.9%
Q2 25
27.4%
13.2%
Q1 25
16.1%
14.1%
Q4 24
22.7%
17.6%
Q3 24
19.9%
15.4%
Q2 24
19.4%
15.6%
Q1 24
20.0%
14.1%
EPS (diluted)
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$0.11
$2.22
Q3 25
$1.31
$1.77
Q2 25
$0.57
$1.59
Q1 25
$0.33
$1.51
Q4 24
$0.50
$2.22
Q3 24
$0.44
$1.69
Q2 24
$0.41
$1.83
Q1 24
$0.42
$1.47

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$179.3M
$165.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$580.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.4B
$1.4B
Total Assets
$10.9B
$2.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.42×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$179.3M
$165.1M
Q3 25
$372.4M
$170.0M
Q2 25
$193.1M
$147.0M
Q1 25
$146.7M
$170.6M
Q4 24
$165.7M
$164.6M
Q3 24
$625.4M
$154.4M
Q2 24
$835.9M
$146.8M
Q1 24
$855.0M
$148.3M
Total Debt
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$580.9M
Q3 25
$628.6M
Q2 25
$679.3M
Q1 25
$502.1M
Q4 24
$508.0M
Q3 24
$554.7M
Q2 24
$588.2M
Q1 24
$596.2M
Stockholders' Equity
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$5.4B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$5.5B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$5.4B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$5.4B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$5.4B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$5.4B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$5.4B
$1.0B
Q1 24
$5.4B
$994.8M
Total Assets
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$10.9B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$11.0B
$2.6B
Q2 25
$10.9B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$10.9B
$2.2B
Q4 24
$10.9B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$11.4B
$2.2B
Q2 24
$11.5B
$2.2B
Q1 24
$11.6B
$2.2B
Debt / Equity
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
0.42×
Q3 25
0.48×
Q2 25
0.54×
Q1 25
0.42×
Q4 24
0.44×
Q3 24
0.51×
Q2 24
0.57×
Q1 24
0.60×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$566.3M
$122.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$450.3M
$106.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
165.4%
20.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
42.6%
3.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
33.10×
1.41×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$833.0M
$295.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$566.3M
$122.4M
Q3 25
$176.6M
$112.5M
Q2 25
$143.7M
$67.2M
Q1 25
$136.9M
$61.8M
Q4 24
$541.1M
$107.9M
Q3 24
$176.3M
$84.3M
Q2 24
$88.7M
$53.3M
Q1 24
$167.9M
$50.9M
Free Cash Flow
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
$450.3M
$106.0M
Q3 25
$148.7M
$100.5M
Q2 25
$118.4M
$37.9M
Q1 25
$115.6M
$51.0M
Q4 24
$440.8M
$93.5M
Q3 24
$147.2M
$70.1M
Q2 24
$69.5M
$39.0M
Q1 24
$151.9M
$39.7M
FCF Margin
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
165.4%
20.8%
Q3 25
53.1%
21.4%
Q2 25
40.9%
8.0%
Q1 25
42.7%
12.1%
Q4 24
153.9%
18.7%
Q3 24
50.8%
16.2%
Q2 24
24.7%
8.4%
Q1 24
54.5%
9.6%
Capex Intensity
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
42.6%
3.2%
Q3 25
10.0%
2.6%
Q2 25
8.7%
6.2%
Q1 25
7.9%
2.6%
Q4 24
35.0%
2.9%
Q3 24
10.1%
3.3%
Q2 24
6.8%
3.1%
Q1 24
5.7%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
KRC
KRC
MSA
MSA
Q4 25
33.10×
1.41×
Q3 25
1.09×
1.62×
Q2 25
1.81×
1.07×
Q1 25
3.13×
1.04×
Q4 24
8.32×
1.23×
Q3 24
3.06×
1.27×
Q2 24
1.63×
0.74×
Q1 24
3.01×
0.88×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRC
KRC

Segment breakdown not available.

MSA
MSA

Americas Segment$335.2M66%
International Segment$175.7M34%

Related Comparisons