vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ProPetro Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($289.7M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.1× KILROY REALTY CORP). On growth, KILROY REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.0% vs -9.6%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $16.8M). Over the past eight quarters, KILROY REALTY CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -15.5%).

Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.

ProPetro Holding Corp. is a leading U.S.-based oilfield services provider. It offers hydraulic fracturing, well completion and related supporting services primarily to onshore oil and gas exploration and production operators, with core operations concentrated in the Permian Basin spanning Texas and New Mexico.

KRC vs PUMP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PUMP
PUMP
1.1× larger
PUMP
$289.7M
$272.2M
KRC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KRC
KRC
+4.7% gap
KRC
-5.0%
-9.6%
PUMP
More free cash flow
KRC
KRC
$433.5M more FCF
KRC
$450.3M
$16.8M
PUMP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KRC
KRC
Annualised
KRC
-1.2%
-15.5%
PUMP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Revenue
$272.2M
$289.7M
Net Profit
$17.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
2.1%
Net Margin
6.3%
Revenue YoY
-5.0%
-9.6%
Net Profit YoY
-73.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.01

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$272.2M
$289.7M
Q3 25
$279.7M
$293.9M
Q2 25
$289.9M
$326.2M
Q1 25
$270.8M
$359.4M
Q4 24
$286.4M
$320.6M
Q3 24
$289.9M
$360.9M
Q2 24
$280.7M
$357.0M
Q1 24
$278.6M
$405.8M
Net Profit
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$17.1M
Q3 25
$162.3M
$-2.4M
Q2 25
$79.6M
$-7.2M
Q1 25
$43.7M
$9.6M
Q4 24
$65.0M
Q3 24
$57.7M
$-137.1M
Q2 24
$54.5M
$-3.7M
Q1 24
$55.7M
$19.9M
Operating Margin
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
2.1%
Q3 25
-2.1%
Q2 25
-1.0%
Q1 25
2.6%
Q4 24
-5.8%
Q3 24
-49.4%
Q2 24
-0.1%
Q1 24
7.5%
Net Margin
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
6.3%
Q3 25
58.0%
-0.8%
Q2 25
27.4%
-2.2%
Q1 25
16.1%
2.7%
Q4 24
22.7%
Q3 24
19.9%
-38.0%
Q2 24
19.4%
-1.0%
Q1 24
20.0%
4.9%
EPS (diluted)
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$0.11
$0.01
Q3 25
$1.31
$-0.02
Q2 25
$0.57
$-0.07
Q1 25
$0.33
$0.09
Q4 24
$0.50
$-0.14
Q3 24
$0.44
$-1.32
Q2 24
$0.41
$-0.03
Q1 24
$0.42
$0.18

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$179.3M
$91.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.4B
$829.8M
Total Assets
$10.9B
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$179.3M
$91.3M
Q3 25
$372.4M
$76.7M
Q2 25
$193.1M
$83.0M
Q1 25
$146.7M
$71.4M
Q4 24
$165.7M
$58.3M
Q3 24
$625.4M
$54.0M
Q2 24
$835.9M
$74.7M
Q1 24
$855.0M
$53.6M
Stockholders' Equity
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$5.4B
$829.8M
Q3 25
$5.5B
$826.2M
Q2 25
$5.4B
$824.0M
Q1 25
$5.4B
$826.5M
Q4 24
$5.4B
$816.3M
Q3 24
$5.4B
$833.0M
Q2 24
$5.4B
$975.8M
Q1 24
$5.4B
$998.2M
Total Assets
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$10.9B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$11.0B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$10.9B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$10.9B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$10.9B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$11.4B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$11.5B
$1.5B
Q1 24
$11.6B
$1.2B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$566.3M
$81.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$450.3M
$16.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
165.4%
5.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
42.6%
22.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
33.10×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$833.0M
$45.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$566.3M
$81.0M
Q3 25
$176.6M
$41.7M
Q2 25
$143.7M
$54.2M
Q1 25
$136.9M
$54.7M
Q4 24
$541.1M
$37.9M
Q3 24
$176.3M
$34.7M
Q2 24
$88.7M
$104.9M
Q1 24
$167.9M
$74.8M
Free Cash Flow
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
$450.3M
$16.8M
Q3 25
$148.7M
$-2.4M
Q2 25
$118.4M
$17.1M
Q1 25
$115.6M
$13.8M
Q4 24
$440.8M
$10.0M
Q3 24
$147.2M
$-6.0M
Q2 24
$69.5M
$67.7M
Q1 24
$151.9M
$40.2M
FCF Margin
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
165.4%
5.8%
Q3 25
53.1%
-0.8%
Q2 25
40.9%
5.2%
Q1 25
42.7%
3.8%
Q4 24
153.9%
3.1%
Q3 24
50.8%
-1.7%
Q2 24
24.7%
19.0%
Q1 24
54.5%
9.9%
Capex Intensity
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
42.6%
22.2%
Q3 25
10.0%
15.0%
Q2 25
8.7%
11.4%
Q1 25
7.9%
11.4%
Q4 24
35.0%
8.7%
Q3 24
10.1%
11.3%
Q2 24
6.8%
10.4%
Q1 24
5.7%
8.5%
Cash Conversion
KRC
KRC
PUMP
PUMP
Q4 25
33.10×
Q3 25
1.09×
Q2 25
1.81×
Q1 25
3.13×
5.70×
Q4 24
8.32×
Q3 24
3.06×
Q2 24
1.63×
Q1 24
3.01×
3.75×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KRC
KRC

Segment breakdown not available.

PUMP
PUMP

Hydraulic Fracturing Segment$203.9M70%
Wireline Operating Segment$55.4M19%
Cementing Operating Segment$29.6M10%

Related Comparisons