vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC) and WORKIVA INC (WK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $247.3M, roughly 1.1× WORKIVA INC). WORKIVA INC runs the higher net margin — 7.7% vs 6.3%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORKIVA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.9% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $25.7M). Over the past eight quarters, WORKIVA INC's revenue compounded faster (18.0% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
Workiva, Inc. is a global software-as-a-service (SaaS) company. It provides a cloud-based connected and reporting compliance platform that enables the use of connected data and automation of reporting across finance, accounting, risk, and compliance.
KRC vs WK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $272.2M | $247.3M |
| Net Profit | $17.1M | $19.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 25.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 7.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.0% | 19.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $247.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $272.2M | $238.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.9M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $270.8M | $206.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.4M | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $289.9M | $185.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $280.7M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.6M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.7M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.5M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 76.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.4% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | -9.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.31 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $179.3M | $334.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $179.3M | $338.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.4M | $315.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.7M | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.7M | $301.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.4M | $248.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $835.9M | $267.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $-66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $-75.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $-41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $-50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $-77.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $566.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $450.3M | $25.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 165.4% | 10.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 42.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 33.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $833.0M | $171.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $566.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.6M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.9M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.7M | $-14.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $450.3M | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.7M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.6M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $440.8M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | $-122.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 165.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.7% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 153.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.10× | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 16.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.
WK
| Subscription and support | $225.4M | 91% |
| Other | $22.0M | 9% |
