vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST (KRG) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.7M vs $117.3M, roughly 1.7× Latham Group, Inc.). KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST runs the higher net margin — 0.2% vs -7.3%, a 7.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST's revenue compounded faster (-2.8% CAGR vs -14.4%).
Kite Realty Group Trust is a publicly traded U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality open-air shopping centers and mixed-use properties, with a portfolio spanning key regional markets across the United States. Its tenant base includes national retail chains, local independent merchants, and dining and entertainment operators, serving local community consumer needs.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
KRG vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.7M | $117.3M |
| Net Profit | $330.0K | $-8.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 0.2% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.2% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.6% | -43.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.7M | $117.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.2M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.1M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.4M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $221.8M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $214.7M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $207.3M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $212.4M | $160.1M |
| Q1 26 | $330.0K | $-8.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.6M | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.5% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 88.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.9% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.06 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $396.7M |
| Total Assets | $6.4B | $856.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $467.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $282.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | $396.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $408.1M |
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | $856.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0B | $830.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.93× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.89× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.97× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.97× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-47.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.6M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.2M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $132.8M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.1M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.0M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.1M | $52.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.20× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.72× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KRG
| Rental income | $198.0M | 99% |
| Fee income | $1.3M | 1% |
SWIM
Segment breakdown not available.
