vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $115.6M, roughly 1.9× Karat Packaging Inc.). Perella Weinberg Partners runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 5.9%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Karat Packaging Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -2.9%). Perella Weinberg Partners produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.5M vs $15.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs 10.0%).
Karat Packaging Inc. is a specialty manufacturer and distributor of disposable foodservice packaging products. Its offerings include paper and plastic cups, food containers, cutlery, lids, and custom branded solutions, serving restaurant chains, cafes, catering operators, and retail foodservice clients primarily across North America.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
KRT vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $115.6M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | $6.8M | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $115.6M | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.5M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.6M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.6M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.6M | $102.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $-66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -30.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | -52.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | -24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.36 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.54 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.9M | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $149.4M | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $287.7M | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.9M | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.0M | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.3M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.9M | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.4M | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $185.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.7M | $156.7M |
| Q4 25 | $149.4M | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.5M | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.8M | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.3M | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $155.6M | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3M | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $-283.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $154.4M | $161.9M |
| Q4 25 | $287.7M | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.8M | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.0M | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $312.2M | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $294.5M | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.8M | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.7M | $645.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.0M | $583.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.4M | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.1M | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.1% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.26× | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.1M | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.4M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $982.0K | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.7M | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.5M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-206.3M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $736.0K | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6M | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-214.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.0% | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | -210.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.26× | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.89× | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.21× | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.14× | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
