vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $613.3M, roughly 2.3× Kontoor Brands, Inc.). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 15.1%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs 6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.'s revenue compounded faster (18.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
KTB vs LOGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $613.3M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $92.4M | $251.0M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.1% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.0% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 116.0% | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.65 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $613.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.9M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | $170.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $144.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.8M | $141.8M |
| Q1 26 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.7% | 42.8% |
| Q1 26 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.65 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.4M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $618.9M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.85× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $56.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $618.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.2M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $480.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $465.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 32.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $903.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $480.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $228.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.2M | $176.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $465.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.8M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | $116.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | $356.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.9M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.6M | $161.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 1.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
