vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.3M vs $359.3M, roughly 1.7× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). Kontoor Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs -2.5%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (45.0% vs 15.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
KTB vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $613.3M | $359.3M |
| Net Profit | $92.4M | $-9.1M |
| Gross Margin | 53.7% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 15.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.1% | -2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 45.0% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 116.0% | 72.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.65 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $613.3M | $359.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.9M | $284.3M |
| Q1 26 | $92.4M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.8M | $-6.3M |
| Q1 26 | 53.7% | 80.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.7% | 83.1% |
| Q1 26 | 14.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | -5.2% |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.65 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.4M | $386.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $618.9M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.85× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $56.4M | $386.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $735.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $618.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $76.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $76.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.2M | $58.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.8M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.6M | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 20.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| Wrangler U.S | $373.7M | 61% |
| Helly Hansen International | $129.3M | 21% |
| Wrangler International | $62.1M | 10% |
| Helly Hansen U.S | $36.2M | 6% |
| Global Other | $12.0M | 2% |
PCOR
Segment breakdown not available.
