vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($853.2M vs $664.6M, roughly 1.3× Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.). Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 4.3%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 4.1%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a hotel, resort, entertainment, and media company named for one of its assets: the Ryman Auditorium, a National Historic Landmark in Nashville, Tennessee. The company's legal lineage can be traced back to its time as a subsidiary of Edward Gaylord's Oklahoma Publishing Company; however, the backbone of the modern entity was formed with the company's acquisition of WSM, Inc. in 1983. This purchase resulted in the ownership of the Grand Ole Opry and associa...
KTB vs RHP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $853.2M | $664.6M |
| Net Profit | $36.9M | $69.4M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 20.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 10.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.3% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.6% | 10.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $664.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $737.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | $592.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | $659.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | $587.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | $647.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | $550.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.9M | $613.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $69.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $71.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.8M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | 40.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | 44.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.7% | 48.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 27.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $1.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $529.6M | $770.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $6.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $471.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $483.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $420.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | $413.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | $477.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | $534.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $498.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $770.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $750.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | $758.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | $800.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | $531.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | $549.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | $551.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.2M | $562.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.74× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $228.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $205.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $122.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $98.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $218.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.2M | $184.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.8M | $135.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.9M | $85.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.6M | $78.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 12.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 19.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 5.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 3.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 1.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| International Member | $292.0M | 34% |
| CTC Triangle B.V | $192.7M | 23% |
| Lee Segment | $186.7M | 22% |
| Helly Hansen Segment | $185.9M | 22% |
RHP
| Food and beverage | $289.3M | 44% |
| Rooms | $223.8M | 34% |
| Entertainment | $79.2M | 12% |
| Other | $72.3M | 11% |
