vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kontoor Brands, Inc. (KTB) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kontoor Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($853.2M vs $786.9M, roughly 1.1× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 4.3%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kontoor Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.3% vs 18.0%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs 14.2%).
Kontoor Brands is an American clothing company. It was a spin off from the VF Corporation in May 2019, and markets clothing under the Lee, Wrangler and Helly Hansen brand names.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
KTB vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $853.2M | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $36.9M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.3% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.6% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $853.2M | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.3M | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $622.9M | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $699.3M | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $670.2M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $606.9M | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $631.2M | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.9M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.9M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.0M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.5M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.8M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.3% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.5% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.7% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.7% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.13 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.26 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $82.4M | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $529.6M | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.53× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.1M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.4M | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.3M | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $215.1M | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $745.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $749.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $779.2M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.6M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.3M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.7M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $400.1M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $356.9M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.2M | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $387.2M | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.53× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.74× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.09× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.01× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.1M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.74× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $228.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.6M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $96.2M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.28× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.86× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.95× | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KTB
| International Member | $292.0M | 34% |
| CTC Triangle B.V | $192.7M | 23% |
| Lee Segment | $186.7M | 22% |
| Helly Hansen Segment | $185.9M | 22% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
