vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -667.6%, a 654.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -55.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 10.1%).
Kymera Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specialized in developing innovative targeted protein degradation therapies. It advances a diversified pipeline of drug candidates targeting previously undruggable proteins to address unmet medical needs in oncology, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases worldwide.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
KYMR vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-76.6M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -736.8% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | -667.6% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -55.3% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -82.1% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.95 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-76.6M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.6M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-70.8M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.1M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.6M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -736.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -336.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1092.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -198.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -562.2% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -667.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -296.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -956.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -164.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -472.0% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.95 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.82 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.89 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.69 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $335.8M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $971.5M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $335.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.6M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $971.5M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $786.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $835.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $684.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $711.2M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $918.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $978.0M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $826.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $868.3M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-59.9M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-60.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -527.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-250.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-59.9M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-79.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-61.8M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-42.9M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.6M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-79.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-62.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-47.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -527.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -360.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -848.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -185.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -456.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KYMR
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
