vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Loews Corporation (L) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $827.0M, roughly 1.3× Loews Corporation). Loews Corporation runs the higher net margin — 48.6% vs 14.3%, a 34.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Loews Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 1.7%). Loews Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($426.0M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Loews Corporation's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Loews Corporation is a diversified US-based conglomerate that operates across multiple key industry segments through its subsidiaries. Its core business lines include property and casualty insurance, natural gas pipeline transportation, hospitality services, and upstream oil and gas exploration and production, primarily serving commercial, consumer and industrial clients across North American markets.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
L vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $827.0M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $402.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 65.4% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 48.6% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 115.0% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.93 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $827.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $732.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $769.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $846.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $789.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $711.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $402.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $401.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 65.4% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 94.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.6% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.4% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.93 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.43 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.87 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.74 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.67 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.05 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.0B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $86.3B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $8.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.4B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $18.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $86.3B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.9B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.9B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.46× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.45× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.52× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.52× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.52× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $617.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $426.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.5% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.1% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.53× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.7B | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $617.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $920.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $736.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $941.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $934.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $952.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $426.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $764.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $872.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $638.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $767.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $794.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $793.0M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 51.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 104.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 113.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 97.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 116.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 111.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.4% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.57× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.99× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.03× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.33× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.58× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.43× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
L
| Transportation And Storage Of Natural Gas And NG Ls And Ethane Supply And Transportation Services | $601.0M | 73% |
| Lodging And Related Services | $226.0M | 27% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
