vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK) and EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.3× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -2.0%, a 29.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
LARK vs MRAM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.8M | $14.9M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-296.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.0% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $10.6M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1M | $-296.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $54.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $-670.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | -7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.9% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.7% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | 27.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.5% | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | -23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.66 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.85 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.68 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $40.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $70.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $83.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $31.9M | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $160.6M | $68.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $65.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $148.4M | $64.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $62.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.7M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.3M | $55.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $83.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $80.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $78.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $80.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $72.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $64.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $570.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $570.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $881.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $-975.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $543.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0M | $527.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $1.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 112.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.3% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.6% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.56× | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | 16.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.34× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
