vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LandBridge Co LLC (LB) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.4× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs -19.9%, a 34.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs -20.7%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).

Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.

LB vs MX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LB
LB
1.4× larger
LB
$56.8M
$40.6M
MX
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LB
LB
+76.2% gap
LB
55.6%
-20.7%
MX
Higher net margin
LB
LB
34.1% more per $
LB
14.2%
-19.9%
MX
More free cash flow
LB
LB
$126.9M more FCF
LB
$122.0M
$-4.8M
MX
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LB
LB
Annualised
LB
72.8%
-3.4%
MX

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LB
LB
MX
MX
Revenue
$56.8M
$40.6M
Net Profit
$8.1M
$-8.1M
Gross Margin
9.3%
Operating Margin
60.0%
-26.1%
Net Margin
14.2%
-19.9%
Revenue YoY
55.6%
-20.7%
Net Profit YoY
-83.7%
50.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.24
$-0.23

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$56.8M
$40.6M
Q3 25
$50.8M
$45.9M
Q2 25
$47.5M
$47.6M
Q1 25
$44.0M
$44.7M
Q4 24
$36.5M
$51.2M
Q3 24
$28.5M
$55.4M
Q2 24
$26.0M
$46.4M
Q1 24
$19.0M
$43.4M
Net Profit
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$8.1M
$-8.1M
Q3 25
$8.1M
$-13.1M
Q2 25
$7.5M
$323.0K
Q1 25
$6.5M
$-8.9M
Q4 24
$49.3M
$-16.3M
Q3 24
$2.7M
$-9.6M
Q2 24
$-57.7M
$-13.0M
Q1 24
$10.8M
$-15.4M
Gross Margin
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
9.3%
Q3 25
18.6%
Q2 25
20.4%
Q1 25
20.9%
Q4 24
21.7%
Q3 24
20.8%
Q2 24
21.1%
Q1 24
14.6%
Operating Margin
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
60.0%
-26.1%
Q3 25
60.8%
-25.1%
Q2 25
60.0%
-15.6%
Q1 25
57.0%
-14.1%
Q4 24
49.4%
-12.5%
Q3 24
11.2%
-8.1%
Q2 24
-197.4%
-12.3%
Q1 24
71.1%
-21.6%
Net Margin
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
14.2%
-19.9%
Q3 25
15.9%
-28.5%
Q2 25
15.8%
0.7%
Q1 25
14.7%
-19.9%
Q4 24
135.2%
-31.8%
Q3 24
9.3%
-17.3%
Q2 24
-222.1%
-28.0%
Q1 24
56.7%
-35.5%
EPS (diluted)
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$0.24
$-0.23
Q3 25
$0.26
$-0.36
Q2 25
$0.24
$0.01
Q1 25
$0.20
$-0.24
Q4 24
$-0.44
Q3 24
$-0.04
$-0.26
Q2 24
$-0.34
Q1 24
$-0.40

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LB
LB
MX
MX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$30.7M
$103.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$570.7M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$340.3M
$248.3M
Total Assets
$1.4B
$351.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.68×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$30.7M
$103.8M
Q3 25
$28.3M
$108.0M
Q2 25
$20.3M
$113.3M
Q1 25
$14.9M
$132.7M
Q4 24
$37.0M
$138.6M
Q3 24
$14.4M
$151.1M
Q2 24
$24.6M
$162.5M
Q1 24
$171.6M
Total Debt
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$570.7M
Q3 25
$366.1M
Q2 25
$370.9M
Q1 25
$375.5M
Q4 24
$385.5M
Q3 24
$242.4M
Q2 24
$360.8M
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$340.3M
$248.3M
Q3 25
$272.0M
$255.3M
Q2 25
$266.4M
$270.2M
Q1 25
$217.0M
$269.2M
Q4 24
$211.8M
$276.8M
Q3 24
$97.2M
$299.6M
Q2 24
$296.4M
$305.8M
Q1 24
$162.3M
$321.9M
Total Assets
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$1.4B
$351.5M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$359.6M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$370.5M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$373.9M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$379.3M
Q3 24
$689.9M
$411.4M
Q2 24
$710.5M
$412.7M
Q1 24
$426.2M
Debt / Equity
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
1.68×
Q3 25
1.35×
Q2 25
1.39×
Q1 25
1.73×
Q4 24
1.82×
Q3 24
2.49×
Q2 24
1.22×
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LB
LB
MX
MX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$126.3M
$5.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$122.0M
$-4.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
214.9%
-11.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
7.5%
25.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
15.68×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$207.7M
$-54.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$126.3M
$5.4M
Q3 25
$34.9M
$162.0K
Q2 25
$37.3M
$-25.1M
Q1 25
$15.9M
$-4.7M
Q4 24
$67.6M
$11.9M
Q3 24
$7.5M
$-12.9M
Q2 24
$16.0M
$-1.1M
Q1 24
$17.2M
$-4.0M
Free Cash Flow
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
$122.0M
$-4.8M
Q3 25
$33.7M
$-7.5M
Q2 25
$36.1M
$-37.0M
Q1 25
$15.8M
$-4.9M
Q4 24
$66.7M
$4.4M
Q3 24
$7.1M
$-15.5M
Q2 24
$15.7M
$-2.0M
Q1 24
$17.1M
$-4.6M
FCF Margin
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
214.9%
-11.9%
Q3 25
66.3%
-16.3%
Q2 25
75.9%
-77.7%
Q1 25
36.0%
-10.9%
Q4 24
182.6%
8.7%
Q3 24
25.1%
-28.0%
Q2 24
60.4%
-4.3%
Q1 24
90.1%
-10.7%
Capex Intensity
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
7.5%
25.3%
Q3 25
2.3%
16.7%
Q2 25
2.6%
24.9%
Q1 25
0.2%
0.5%
Q4 24
2.7%
14.5%
Q3 24
1.1%
4.7%
Q2 24
1.4%
1.9%
Q1 24
0.5%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
LB
LB
MX
MX
Q4 25
15.68×
Q3 25
4.31×
Q2 25
4.98×
-77.81×
Q1 25
2.46×
Q4 24
1.37×
Q3 24
2.80×
Q2 24
Q1 24
1.60×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LB
LB

Segment breakdown not available.

MX
MX

Power Analog Solutions$36.8M91%
Power Ic$3.8M9%

Related Comparisons