vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LandBridge Co LLC (LB) and Ouster, Inc. (OUST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ouster, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.2M vs $56.8M, roughly 1.1× LandBridge Co LLC). On growth, Ouster, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (106.6% vs 55.6%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $-37.2M). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs 54.8%).
Ouster, Inc. is an American lidar technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It builds high-resolution, digital 3D lidar sensors for use in autonomous vehicles, industrial, robotics, drones, mapping, defense, and security systems.
LB vs OUST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.8M | $62.2M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | 60.0% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 55.6% | 106.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0M | $25.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-57.7M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $-23.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.6% |
| Q4 25 | 60.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.8% | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.0% | -76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.0% | -73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.4% | -85.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | -98.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -197.4% | -93.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.1% | -99.5% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | -55.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | -67.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 135.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | -91.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -222.1% | -88.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.7% | -91.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.7M | $208.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $340.3M | $261.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $349.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.68× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | $208.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.3M | $244.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.3M | $226.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $168.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.0M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $187.8M |
| Q4 25 | $570.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $366.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $340.3M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.0M | $247.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $266.4M | $221.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.0M | $167.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.8M | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.2M | $171.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.4M | $170.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $162.3M | $167.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $349.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $353.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $268.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.9M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $710.5M | $309.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $317.7M |
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $126.3M | $-15.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.0M | $-37.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 214.9% | -59.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.5% | 35.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 15.68× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $207.7M | $-64.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.3M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.6M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.2M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $122.0M | $-37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.7M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.1M | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | 214.9% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.3% | -50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.9% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.0% | -16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.6% | -13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | -81.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 90.1% | -27.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 15.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.60× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.