vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ) and Lucas GC Ltd (LGCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lucas GC Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.5M vs $4.7M, roughly 1.6× Li Bang International Corp Inc.). Lucas GC Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -23.9%, a 29.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
LBGJ vs LGCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7M | $7.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $414.1K |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 33.7% |
| Operating Margin | -25.1% | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | -23.9% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.5M |
| Q2 25 | — | $414.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M |
| Q2 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q2 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.9% |
| Q2 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $606.9K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8M | $6.3M |
| Total Assets | $28.8M | $8.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $606.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $978.1K |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.8M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LBGJ
Segment breakdown not available.
LGCL
| Recruitment service | $4.4M | 60% |
| Others | $2.9M | 39% |
