vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Li Bang International Corp Inc. (LBGJ) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Li Bang International Corp Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.7M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.8× PureCycle Technologies, Inc.). Li Bang International Corp Inc. runs the higher net margin — -23.9% vs -697.1%, a 673.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Li & Fung Limited is a Hong Kong–based supply chain management company. Established in 1906, the company became publicly traded in 1973 and has since played a significant role in manufacturing apparel, toys, and various consumer goods for major North American and European retailers. Significant growth occurred after its public listing, reaching a peak market capitalization in 2011, but the rise of platforms like Alibaba and Amazon, which directly connect manufacturers with consumers, created ...
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
LBGJ vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1M | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -25.1% | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | -23.9% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $28.8M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.31× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.8M | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $734.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4K | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4K | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
