vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and RAMBUS INC (RMBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $180.2M, roughly 1.4× RAMBUS INC). RAMBUS INC runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs 20.5%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 8.1%). Over the past eight quarters, RAMBUS INC's revenue compounded faster (16.8% CAGR vs 16.1%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Rambus Inc. is an American technology company that designs, develops and licenses chip interface technologies and architectures that are used in digital electronics products. The company, founded in 1990, is well known for inventing RDRAM and for its intellectual property-based litigation following the introduction of DDR-SDRAM memory.
LC vs RMBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $180.2M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $59.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.3% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 33.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | -7.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | $180.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $190.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $178.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $172.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $166.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $161.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $132.1M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | $59.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $63.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $48.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $57.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $48.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $36.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 79.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 79.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 37.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 30.5% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | 33.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 27.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $134.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | — |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $134.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $182.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $79.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $124.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
RMBS
| Product revenue | $88.0M | 49% |
| Royalties | $69.6M | 39% |
| Contract and other revenue | $22.6M | 13% |
