vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and STONERIDGE INC (SRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $205.2M, roughly 1.2× STONERIDGE INC). On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -7.4%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Stoneridge Inc is a global designer and manufacturer of advanced electrical and electronic components, integrated systems, and sensor solutions. It serves automotive, commercial vehicle, off-highway, and aerospace sectors, delivering products that boost vehicle safety, efficiency, connectivity, and environmental performance across key global markets.
LC vs SRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $205.2M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-2.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $205.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $237.1M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $-2.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $66.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $180.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $179.8M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $551.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $201.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $179.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $260.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $253.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $271.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $270.5M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $632.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $639.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $657.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $621.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $662.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $666.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.7B | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-770.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-713.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-339.3M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-669.8M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-932.5M | $8.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9B | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-791.8M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-803.8M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-352.3M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7B | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-682.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-945.3M | $1.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1076.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -323.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -161.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1237.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -338.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.9% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.57× | 3.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
SRI
| Control Devices | $51.7M | 25% |
| Electronics | $38.0M | 19% |
| EE | $34.2M | 17% |
| SE | $28.6M | 14% |
| NL | $24.5M | 12% |
| Stoneridge Brazil | $14.1M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific | $13.1M | 6% |