vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.3× LendingClub Corp). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs -16.4%, a 36.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs -7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -40.6%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
LC vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $347.6M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $4.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $192.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $973.1M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-770.8M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-713.1M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-339.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6B | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-669.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-932.5M | $-33.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-791.8M | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-803.8M | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-352.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7B | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-682.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-945.3M | $-38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1076.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.4% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -323.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -161.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1237.8% | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -338.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.9% | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -46.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.57× | -7.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
