vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC (LECO) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 12.6%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.5% vs 1.7%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $52.0M). Over the past eight quarters, LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational and global manufacturer of welding products, arc welding equipment, welding accessories, plasma and oxy-fuel cutting equipment and robotic welding systems headquartered in Euclid, Ohio. It has a network of distributors and sales offices covering more than 160 countries and 42 manufacturing locations in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. It also operates manufacturing alliances and joint ventures in 19 co...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
LECO vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $136.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 34.7% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.6% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.5% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.0% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.45 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $983.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $981.2M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $136.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.6M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.4M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.2M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.8M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.7M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.4M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 34.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.5% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.8% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.45 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.56 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.10 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.47 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.77 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.77 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.14 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $308.8M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $308.8M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $293.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $299.5M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.7M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.3M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $404.2M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.7M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $375.0M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.8% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.70× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $534.2M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.7M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.8M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.7M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.8M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.2M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.7M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.3M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $52.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $205.1M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.7M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.3M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $163.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.5M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $107.0M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.9% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.93× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.98× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.08× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LECO
| Americas Welding | $681.9M | 63% |
| International Welding | $259.4M | 24% |
| Harris Products Group | $137.4M | 13% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
