vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legacy Housing Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.5M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs -13.2%, a 45.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -30.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
LEGH vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 40.4% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 32.2% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -30.6% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.5% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.1% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.6M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $580.3M | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.0K | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0K | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.0K | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $528.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $512.8M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $450.4M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $580.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.2M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $521.4M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $514.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.0M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
