vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legacy Housing Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.5M vs $20.4M, roughly 1.2× TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs 32.2%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs -30.6%). Over the past eight quarters, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
LEGH vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 40.4% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | 32.2% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -30.6% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.5% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.1% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.60 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.64 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.6M | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $580.3M | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.0K | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0K | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.0K | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $528.6M | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.6M | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $512.8M | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.3M | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $450.4M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $580.3M | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.9M | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.6M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.2M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $521.4M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $514.9M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.0M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.32× | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.32× | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
MITT
Segment breakdown not available.
